WordPress

8 Best PHP Frameworks in 2022

Best PHP Frameworks in 2022

Best PHP Frameworks in 2022

8 Best PHP Frameworks in 2022 PHP is the most generally utilized programming language on the web, driving well-known sites like Facebook and Wikipedia. It’s not difficult to learn and allows you to fabricate web applications rapidly.

Endless engineers all over the planet use PHP and outsider application structures based on top of it. PHP systems permit you to be more useful and assemble hearty applications on a steady and all-around tried establishment.

Systems can likewise relieve a few shortcomings of the PHP language, which makes them a sure thing in any event, for requesting applications.

Programming improvement is turning out to be progressively complicated and requires the utilization of modules, plan examples, and apparatuses to make dependable applications in a sensible timespan. That is the place where structures can have a major effect.

In this article, we’ll go through the best PHP systems, and examine their center assets and shortcomings. Before the finish of the perusing, you’ll have a decent comprehension of which PHP systems can cover your particular web advancement needs.

1. Laravel

laravel-logo

Laravel is the most well-known PHP system. At first, delivered in 2011 by Taylor Otwell, it has since become a developed structure with many patrons and a large number of establishments.

It depends on an MVC design and uses its own templating language called Blade, which makes it simple to make HTML formats. With respect to getting to data sets, Laravel utilizes Eloquent ORM which is straightforward and useful.

Expressive ORM is an article social mapper that permits you to characterize models and connections in PHP which is then deciphered and executed as SQL. This keeps your code perfect and basic while allowing you effectively to change to an alternate information base framework on the off chance that you decide to.

What makes Laravel stand apart is the tremendous assortment of highlights, bundles, and applications that make advancement quicker and simpler.

Lines, for instance, permit you to run specific weighty assignments non concurrently, without stressing your application and deferring stacking time for your clients. Different elements, for example, reserving, broadcasting occasions for continuous web encounters, and verifying clients, are totally upheld out of the container.

As indicated by a study by Jetbrains, Laravel is utilized by half of PHP engineers. You can utilize it to assemble any sort of venture, including SaaS, eCommerce, and different sorts of utilizations. Little organizations pick this is on the grounds that it’s not difficult to learn, while enormous undertakings depend on this as a direct result of its strong elements.

Pros

  • It’s a great starting point for beginners, thanks to its great documentation and large community.
  • The syntax is straightforward and it can be so intuitive that your code works like “magic”. This makes Laravel easy to learn and understand with no prior experience.
  • You can easily deploy to AWS or other cloud providers thanks to Laravel Forge and Laravel Envoyer.
  • You can install a large variety of packages and applications to add new features (such as built-in subscription billing with Laravel Cashier).
  • It contains almost every feature that advanced applications may require, along with being highly robust and secure.

Cons

  • Many developers find Laravel highly opinionated because the syntax and project structure is enforced.
  • It’s a somewhat heavy framework because of its many features, making it slower than other alternatives.
  • When databases and queries become complex, Eloquent ORM may require raw SQL statements to function efficiently.

2. Symfony

symfony

Symfony is a full-grown structure that altered PHP improvement. Aside from being a system, it offers a bunch of reusable parts that can be utilized straightforwardly in any PHP project. These parts are utilized in innumerable open-source apparatuses, including Laravel. Symfony is kept up with and upheld by SensioLabs, has 100s of donors, and has a lively local area of engineers.

It depends on the MVC example and offers object-social planning utilizing Doctrine ORM. With regards to making sees, it utilizes the Twig format motor to assist you with delivering HTML.

Symfony legitimately has a place with the rundown of the best PHP systems as a result of its assortment of elements, enormous local area, and power.

It’s great for more perplexing web projects where consistency, backing, and advancement are required. Symfony has different drivers for big business information bases, settling on it an incredible decision for big business projects too.

Pros

  • Symfony is a mature framework that you can trust to provide long-term support (see the release calendar for LTS versions).
  • It’s highly customizable and contains 50 standalone components that can be used in any project.
  • Advanced functional and unit testing is possible thanks to its built-in testing capabilities.
  • Maintaining your project is easier because Symfony has a well-designed codebase.
  • Symfony has great documentation and a large developer community that you can rely on for answers.

Cons

  • Symfony has a steeper learning curve, and mastering it requires understanding many of its components.
  • It’s somewhat lacking when it comes to dependency injection, as it doesn’t work in an intuitive way.
  • Symfony’s ORM, Doctrine, is considerably more difficult to learn and work with than other ORMs.

3. Phalcon

phalcon-logo

Phalcon is an intriguing system since it’s not written in PHP yet conveyed as a PHP augmentation written in C. Does that imply that you should compose C yourself? No, obviously not. However, since it’s not written in PHP and is straightforwardly accumulated from C, it’s unquestionably quick! Phalcon can deal with a greater number of solicitations each second than some other system by a long shot.

Alongside its blasting quick exhibition, Phalcon offers many elements like an ORM, storing, templating, and security.

Phalcon is suggested when elite execution is significant, so it’s utilized by many enormous organizations.

Note: Not to be mistaken for Falcon in Python.

Pros

  • Phalcon offers great performance as it’s written in C and is pre-compiled.
  • It adds very low overhead to your application.
  • It contains its own SQL dialect called PHQL, which helps you write relational database queries that can be used in multiple database systems.

Cons

  • Phalcon has a slightly more complex syntax compared to other PHP frameworks in this collection.
  • It’s considerably harder to install and deploy because it must be installed as a PHP extension.
  • It only supports 3 database adapters: MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite.

4. CodeIgniter

ci-logo-big-

CodeIgniter is an MVC system in light of PHP that assists developers with quickly making new activities. Something extraordinary with regards to it is that it’s anything but a prohibitive system and can be utilized like a tool compartment that paces up improvement.

Most PHP systems expect you to follow the MVC approach, and despite the fact that CodeIgniter additionally empowers the utilization of the MVC design, it doesn’t implement it. It offers storing, support for quite a long time, directing, and different highlights that are common in current web applications. These highlights are perfectly bundled and can be utilized in an adaptable manner.

Codeigniter is involved by little and enormous associations for building APIs and lightweight web applications.

Pros

  • CodeIgniter has a small overall footprint because it has fewer built-in features.
  • It has great performance out of the box, has fast loading times, and requires less optimization.
  • In PHP most frameworks, the MVC pattern is enforced, but in CodeIgniter, you can choose any design pattern you prefer.

Cons

  • CodeIgniter allows for a lot of flexibility, but this is also a double-edged sword because code maintainability can be difficult to achieve.
  • It generally has fewer libraries and packages for building new features when you compare it to more popular frameworks.
  • CodeIgniter doesn’t offer a stable release calendar, meaning that even security issues can take time to be addressed.

5. Yii

ci-logo-big

Yii is an open-source system for building applications on top of PHP. It depends on OOP and MVC examples and adds less upward by zeroing in for the most part on center usefulness.

Since Yii is much quicker than different structures, it’s suggested for building performant web applications. It tends to be utilized to fabricate anything from web journals to SaaS applications the entire way to online media sites. For a rundown of tasks made with Yii, look at the YiiPowered site.

Pros

  • Yii offers automated CRUD generation with the help of its visual tool Gii.
  • It’s a full-stack framework and supports many front-end operations using AJAX, such as validating inputs.
  • It offers great performance and fast loading times thanks to its small weight.

Cons

  • The ORM used in Yii has weak support for complex relationships and queries. This may force you to write raw SQL while losing some of the benefits of using an ORM.
  • Many features, such as queues and broadcasting, are not supported by default and require extra configuration and installations.
  • Yii is harder to learn, especially for less experienced developers.

6. CakePHP

ci-logo-big

Yii is an open-source system for building applications on top of PHP. It depends on OOP and MVC examples and adds less upward by zeroing in generally on center usefulness.

Since Yii is much quicker than different systems, it’s suggested for building performant web applications. It tends to be utilized to construct anything from web journals to SaaS applications the entire way to online media sites. For a rundown of tasks made with Yii, look at the YiiPowered website.CakePHP allows you to make PHP applications rapidly, with less setup. It offers worked-in highlights that assist you with coding your application’s business rationale. It likewise accompanies an adaptable information base access layer and strong elements that permit you to assemble both straightforward and complex programming frameworks.

It was among the main MVC systems to come into the PHP advancement environment in the mid-2000s, and it has since developed into a full-grown structure with huge loads of elements.

The manner in which CakePHP is planned makes it stand apart in light of the fact that it offers a show-based arrangement. By setting up an information base with explicit naming shows, CakePHP can consequently work with no design.

It’s utilized by little and enormous organizations the same – you can see some true CakePHP projects in their authority exhibit.

Pros

  • CakePHP’s convention-based setup makes it easy to build new applications quickly, once you master the framework.
  • It has many built-in features, such as authentication, validation, localization, and more.
  • CakePHP contains all modern security features, and its codebase has been audited by the Mozilla Secure Open Source program.

Cons

  • The CakePHP community is somewhat small, so it can be hard to find solutions to your specific issues.
  • CakePHP doesn’t support default routes for fancy URLs, which is found in most other frameworks.
  • Many developers experience issues upgrading from older to newer versions, or vice-versa.
  • The fact that it’s convention-based means that you have less freedom.

7. Slim Framework

Slim Framework

Thin is a PHP miniature structure. It has fewer elements than a commonplace structure however assists you with making basic yet strong web applications and APIs.

It incorporates elements, for example, steering, middleware, and progressed demand taking care of to assist you with building applications rapidly. Highlights that are ordinarily found in many structures, for example, data set admittance apparatuses are excluded from Slim yet can be handily introduced as outside conditions utilizing the Composer reliance chief.

Thin is appropriate for building microservices, tranquil APIs for single-page applications (SPAs), and adaptable frameworks.

Pros

  • You can develop fast and lightweight APIs with only a few lines of code.
  • It has a fast loading time and can handle many requests per second.
  • It’s a modern framework that follows up-to-date software development practices.
  • It’s not restrictive and offers a lot of freedom while supporting many key functionalities such as dependency injection, middleware, and routing.

Cons

  • Slim has no ORM by default, but you can use the ORM of your choice by installing it independently.
  • Even though it’s fast, it can handle somewhat fewer requests per second than Lumen (see next).

8. Lumen

Lumen

Lumen is a PHP miniature structure created by the maker of Laravel and kept up with by its local area. It’s basically the same as Laravel, so assuming that you have related knowledge with Laravel, you will feel totally at ease. Thin is likewise lightweight and performant, making it ideal for present-day applications.

It tends to be utilized for building APIs to help single-page applications, microservices, and other back-end administrations where low inactivity and superior execution are significant.

Pros

  • Lumen is easy to learn, especially if you have Laravel experience.
  • It is much lighter than Laravel and requires minimal configuration to get started.
  • Similar to Slim, it’s a modern framework that’s highly suitable for modern web development.
  • If a Lumen project grows too complex and requires Laravel features, it can easily be converted to a Laravel project.

Cons

  • Unfortunately, Lumen doesn’t have the best documentation. Many times, you will have to look into the original Laravel documentation where Lumen borrows many things from.
  • Coming from a Laravel background, you may be missing some key features which will have to be installed manually if you need them.
  • It’s not as actively supported and maintained as Laravel.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *